虽然，这个4个单项在打分的时候，雅思写作考官会单项考虑，但真人打分总归有印象分，因此他们最后会以【是否读懂这篇文章”给出一个综合分数。
因此，逻辑一旦出错，【读懂”就不可能，雅思写作分数就高不了。
这也是为什么那么多985/211大学生雅思写作成绩上不了6的原因。
虽然他们高考英语以及四、六级都能出高分，词汇语法也是6分以上水平，但是逻辑不通顺，写作总分上6就很艰难！
  没有任何老师教过我们逻辑的方法，因为他们自己也没有被教过逻辑推演法。
结果就是：大家写英文文章，常常出现逻辑问题，而又不自知。
前雅思考官Reme在研讨会上就说过：【我们在读中国考生的雅思作文时，脑子里有句话一直重复——这孩子到底想要表达什么？”
 
其实吟领认为——
很多时候大家的文章不是没有逻辑，而是自己内心清楚的逻辑，用英文表达出来变了味，或是逻辑跳跃了——没有说清楚 / 没有说完整。最重点还是没有主动意识到逻辑错在哪了。
 
逻辑错误在中国考生的文章里比比皆是
下面是一个普遍又典型的例子
[吟领VIP学生 — 211在校本科]
开始上课前，他做了一次雅思写作模拟考试，以下是题目和他的全文：
Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings?
With the improvement of people's living standard, the population is largely increasing nowadays. Questions are raised about whether the government should protect historic buildings or destroy them to make room for modern buildings to adapt to the fast-paced society. In my perspective, old and shabby buildings should be replaced by new buildings with original historic features.
Some people hold the view that local historic buildings are the treasures of our ancestors and should be preserved carefully. First and foremost, buildings are beneficial to record the local history. It's the building that witnesses the changes over the past thus conserves the culture diversity. In contrast, modern buildings are likely to be more grant and luxurious but without characteristics. Secondly, if old buildings are well-preserved, the public will have a deep insight about their past generations' life therefore inspire them to relate their current life to the experience of the past. It's of great help to generate the sense of proud and belonging to one's nation thus individuals have a higher likelihood to develop into responsible citizens which can strengthen the social stability.
However, there are opposing views in favor of destroying old buildings and construct modern houses. On the one hand, it's reported that as the buildings get older, they have higher potential to set on fire or collapse which is a tremendous threat to residents living inside. On the other hand, with the explosion of people, the scarce housing resources cannot match the population. Consequently, it's proposed that the shabby and out-of-times buildings should be replaced by skyscrapers to accommodate more people thus improve their living standards and boost the local housing industry.
As discussed above, I reckon instead of destroying those old buildings, government should rebuild houses with serious safety issues according to the original features. Not only can this measure improve people's life but also protect the local culture.  
1）他的词汇和语法水平是明显在线的，第一段的第2句又长又好。当然，正文中有许多基础语法错误，但并不妨害理解。
因此词汇语法得了6分（及格分数）。
 
2）结构+阐述 只有5分，是因为正文两段的观点都没有阐述清楚。
比如二段第一个观点：保护老建筑是因为这些建筑是我们祖先的财富。但后面的两句并没有讲清楚他们为何是财富。
 
逻辑，混乱程度就很可惜了！
仅以第一段为例：
With the improvement of people's living standard, the population is largely increasing nowadays. Questions are raised about whether the government should protect historic buildings or destroy them to make room for modern buildings to adapt to the fast-paced society. In my perspective, old and shabby buildings should be replaced by new buildings with original historic features.
 
问题有两个：

• With the improvement of people's living standard和后面的 the population is largely increasing nowadays，逻辑是跳跃的。凭什么人们的生活水平改善了，然后人口就增长了呐？中国人会觉得理所当然，但英国人理解不了这个二者的必然性，因为欧洲有许多国家生活水平是提高了，但他们的人口却是负增长。

• With the improvement of people's living standard, the population is largely increasing nowadays 与后面这个长句子Questions are raised about whether the government should protect historic buildings or destroy them to make room for modern buildings to adapt to the fast-paced society 也无法逻辑衔接。凭什么【生活水平提高，人口增加了”就会引发人们对于【老建筑拆还是不拆”这样一个社会问题呐？

单就这篇文章第一段的这两个逻辑错误，雅思写作考官就直接将逻辑的评分降到5以下。
  吟领学生雅思写作成绩如何？
雅思首考写作轻松上6 - 6.5 - 7分，屡见不鲜~